cory monteith glee interview

You Be the Critic: STARGATE UNIVERSE

October 3rd, 2009

stargate_universe_cast

Thanks to the void left by BATTLESTAR GALCATICA ending its run combined with our rejuvenated interest in all things space courtesy of JJ. Abrams successful STAR TREK re-boot, Sy Fy’s third incarnation of the STARGATE universe, appropriately titled just that, could not have arrived at a better time. Which is why last night, this TV Addict went where I have never gone before and subjected myself to an actual entire episode of STARGATE.

The two-hour pilot kicked off with a literal bang, when some space baddies (who this STARGATE virgin can only assume have a history of blowing stuff up) attacked a planet — forcing the mysterious Dr. Nicholas Rush (Played by ‘foreigner’ Robert Carlyle, so you know he’s both really smart and obviously ‘up to something’) to shepherd a ragtag group of military types (like Louis Ferreira’s Colonel Young and Brian J. Smith’s Lieutenant Scott), politicos (Elyse Levesque’s Senator’s daughter) and computer nerds (David Blue’s Eli Wallace, serving as a guide into the STARGATE universe for us neophytes), among others — haphazardly through a Stargate. Destination: Who-knows-where!


Of course, ‘who-knows-where’ turned out to be the Destiny, an ancient ship, which as luck would have it, came complete with a Stargate of its very own. Not to mention, enough problems to provide for a solid twenty-two episodes (or more!) of adventure. Giving the crew — when they’re not searching for ways in which to find home — ample opportunity to jump from planet-to-planet for spare parts.

An adventure we’d be a lot more excited for, had ’spare parts’ not also served as an apt metaphor for one of our biggest problems with the show. From the ragtag fleet of painfully generic character archetypes (See: the ex-con, the strong female and Blue’s nerdy comic relief that treads dangerously close to Wesley Crusher levels of annoyance.) to the fact that try as they might, SGU’s pilot failed to introduce even one original story-line (Power struggle between the brilliant but morally ambiguous scientist and the political figure! Hmmm…. Where have I seen that before?), it’s hard to ignore the total lack of originality on the creative team’s part. Especially when the shaky camera docu-drama feel and the dark corridors devoid of light practically beg comparisons of the less-than-kind variety to that of BATTLESTAR GALACTICA.

That said, as all good pilots must, there certainly were more than enough interesting plot threads and likeable personalities (Full disclosure: We have a soft spot for both David Blue and Ming-Na — assuming of course her character ever gets to do anything!) to entice me to jump on the STARGATE bandwagon and give this series a shot.

Will you be joining me for the ride?

21 Responses to “You Be the Critic: STARGATE UNIVERSE”

The1337 Says:

I’m a huge fan of the Stargate franchise having watched all the SG-1 episodes multiple times and every SGA episode. I wanted to like SGU, but it tried too hard to be dark like BSG instead of focusing on story or characters. The 2-hour series premiere was completely unnecessary and could have been cut to an hour thirty or an hour. Full review of the episode.

http://th3tvobsessed.blogspot.com/2009/10/review-stargate-universe-season-1.html

Kyle Says:

I love the Stargate Franchise. I didn’t fall in love with SGU as I did with SGA when I first watched the “Rising” 2 hour pilot. However, by the end of the episode, I was really excited for more–wish they had aired all 3 hours. The one element that seems to be missing right now is humor–it’s very dark at this point. I’m hoping that we will get more levity after the immediate threat subsides. I imagine Eli Wallace will provide the comic relief as Dr. Rodney McKay did for SGA.

Craig Says:

I liked it. It obviously had a touch of BSG in there, and the sex scene seemed out of place for Stargate, but as a whole I very much enjoyed it. I wasn’t a big fan of SG-1 (found it boring) but I loved Atlantis. SGU seems like a completely different kind of animal from those two shows, but it is still very much a Stargate series. Also, the generic characters, as you mentioned, are pretty much in every Stargate show (the military guy, the science guy, the alien guy, the lone female on the team, etc.) so that didn’t bother me too much. This seems much less dark than BSG (which got so depressing I stopped watching in season 3) but much more adult than its predecessors. Hopefully this will be a good (or at least interesting) season of Stargate.

Joseph Says:

Good show!

Being a fan of both SG-1 & Atlantis I found that SGU took me to places that I never thought of. After Atlantis ended I that this was it for the Stargate franchise. But watching SGU I could see that new life was breathe into it. As others have stated above I thought that they could have cut about half to an hour and a half off the show because parts of it almost reminded me of a lame soap opera. I found the Dr to be cold lacking emotion and trying to comfort Miss Armstrong, what was that about? This part should have been cut there was no need for it.

However I found the character of Miss Armstong to be the heart of the show as she brings something fresh to where you connect with her on a personal level. Ely is a cross between the characters O’Neil and Jackson of SG-1 which I found unique and satisfying but wanted more from him. As with the Stargate shows of the past I hope they don’t just introduce you to a new cast and somewhere along the show leave you wondering whatever happened to a particular character.

I feel that there is potential for this series but it needs to break free from concepts of the past and move forward to create something new and fresh. I’m curious as to what the creators have in store. It would be nice to see more aliens and not so many human characters as they have done in the past with SG-1 & Atlantis. I hope that they bring more depth and emotion to the characters without making it a soap opera, but maintaining a nice balance that will leave me on the edge of my seat wanting more. In fact it would be really nice if they made this show interactive where we the audience could have a choice as to what takes place on the show. I know these ideas are new and have never taken place on a show like this but it has the potential to be so much more than just another sci fi show!

ewanspotter Says:

TVAddict, from what I’ve heard, Ming Na will have much more to do later. Initially the character wasn’t as central, but after they brought Ming in, they decided to up the character’s importance.

Look, the comparisons to BSG are there, the comparisons to Voyager are there. Will there be similar elements? Sure. SGU is set on a ship, but it’s not automatically ripping off anything because of this fact. No more than the stranded crew of BSG or Voyager ripped off The Odyssey (cause they did, and somewhere Homer is piiiiiisssed).

ALL characters are archetypes — some more cookie cutter than others. Give me three of your favorite characters from any show or movie, and I could list off their forefathers. The SGU ones deserves time to develop. There’s only so much time in the hour and a half to manage that. The same goes for plot point (as we know there are only 12 out there to begin with).

I’m not defending the pilot’s flaws. There were unnecessary scenes (I’m in no way opposed to adult situations, except when they’re randomly thrown in) and characters who didn’t get much time to develop. There were plenty of spots in the middle where it lagged. But it did what it needed to do. (I’ve heard that part 3 actually ties everything up really well). It was a solid start and, as most science fiction series go, they tend to get better with time. They’ll learn from their mistakes. The things that make us roll our eyes, or characters who don’t ultimately work, will be phased out.

I look forward to seeing where the show is headed.

TVFan Says:

Agreed on all points, although I am sticking with the show through its first few episodes for sure.

Michael T Says:

GREAT!

Elliot Says:

I think most shows try too hard on the pilot. This one is no exception. It seems to have great potential though, and enough going on as to not get boring.

I really hope they don’t make it too much like BSG. It doesn’t need to be super dark or always over the top. If they have people doing ridiculously stupid things that no one would ever do in life or death situation like BSG did I’ll be upset.

But then again it is stargate so I’ll probably just keep watching it anyway.

Todd W in NC Says:

I liked the show too. Maybe it didn’t blow me away, but it had a lot of little good things about it, and I can see the potential in it. I agree with Joseph that Chloe Armstrong is the heart of the show.

Even if the show has some minor flaws, they’re nothing I can’t overlook or forgive. I’m intrigued enough to continue tuning in.

Peter Says:

Has none of the Joy of previous Stargates.

The BSG atmosphere and melodrama seems to preclude any chance this will ever get it back. The is a dark depressing show filled with mostly repulsive characters who all distrust each other.

Other than tacking on the Stargate and some cameos, there is nothing of the fun atmosphere of stargate here and I don’t think it will ever be found because of the dark depressing direction they are taking it.

This is simply BSG with the Cylons replaced by a stargate and poorly done.

maxim Says:

I’m a stargate freak ! I didn’t miss a single episode of SG1 or SGA. to be? honest I’m deeply disappointed of the first premiere of SGU, they are trying to copy a combination of BSG and startrek voyager, with of course a stargate.
the? ship is so “old fashion” ! no technology no imagination at all !
the scientist, the Rush guy,is weird, and the fat gameboy guy, sucks big time !!
I hoped if they could of start for a couple of episodes with some of the old teams, Dr Jackson, Carter or McCoy for example!
and yes,? the guy who “sacrificed” his self, what a none sens !! there’s like 10 possible ways to push that baton ! and the scene of sex ? I mean like come on ! is it how you ganna keep me from zapping the Chanel !
in my opinion it gonna be a big disaster for MGM if they don’t try to make some new scenarios! I fear that the spirit of stargate is lost !

DisappointedFan Says:

this was the most boring Sci-Fi I’ve see in awhile. Fan of Stargate SG-1 but this was sooo….. boring. Nothing really interesting happened that you can’t already anticipate. Just watched the second episode and man… what’s with all this drama they are trying mix up with everyone and everything. It’s more like a soap opera then a Sci-Fi.

Bill Says:

Getting real boring real fast. Give actors too much leeway and they begin to ham. This goes for the doctor, who chews too much scenery. They took 1/2 Rodney for Eli, and gave the pissed-off doctor Rodney’s annoying side. It doesn’t work.

No one seems to like each other. A lot of whining ensues.

SG-1 and Atlantis had some comedy, mostly created when the know-it-all heroes were thrown into situations where they realized their own stupidity. Usually a “You think” and “Oh crap” tipped the audience off.

Skye Graham Says:

I have been a devoted fan of SG-1 and Stargate Alantis, and I was looking forward to Stargate Universe. Was I disappointed. You have a gamer/math kid, an uninteresting secretive science guy, a token blonde, and a whole group of uninteresting, odd background people. Gratuitous sex and distrusting, whining people lost on a space ship barreling through space is not my idea of a good show. If I had wanted to watch Battlestar Gallactica I would have. It has been fun watching the Stargate shows until now. The franchise has been built on good stories, good characters/actors and the stargate as the glue that held it all together. Now we have a runnaway ship, uninteresting stories, uninteresting characters, and oh there happens to be a stargate(and it is not even real!)

Indeed Says:

As others have commented SGU is simply BSG part deux. I sure hope the writers move away from this to something more worthwhile. Having something catastrophic occur on the ship every week will get mundane pretty quick.

I loved both Stargates but this one has way too much human drama. They should rename it Battlestargate Galactica. That is all it is.

JC Says:

Production values, drama, good effects, most of all, a distinct lack of that Stargate cheese. They say immitation is the most sincere form of flattery, and I’m glad SGU took a slice of BSG. Hey, finally a Stargate I can watch.

WBC Says:

How many ways can we say tedious-vapid-plotless-boooooooooorrriiing
i as hoping for so much more than I am getting. Not one decent ET. No antagonist no plot just la ta de do. I think I am going to atch my fingernails grow.

Battlestargate Universe Says:

I completely agree about how blatant they are ripping off BSG. I wouldn’t be surprised if they encounter Cylons in the next episode. And the fat, unfunny nerd IS extremely annoying. This series jumped the shark in the first 5 minutes. And what’s up with Sgt Greer… whut up dawg, gang members in space? It’s the only original aspect of this show but I’ll still pass.

Murray B Says:

SGU is a giant step towards cost-free-TV. That is, TV that will cost nothing to make.

The objective of SGU is to make a Reduced Action Drama with Illumination Obscured. This R.A.D.I.O. will be the next big thing and SGU is well positioned to arrive there first. Soon we will all be sitting around watching our RADIOs, you’ll see.

shegate Says:

This franchise has hit a wall with this latest incarnation..
‘DramaGate Universe”..I really haven’t found any redeeming properties for any of the characters..and the plot lines are booorringg..
there is more to this show resembling a big ,fat soap opera than an action/sci fi tele movie …
and so sad because there are some good ,established actors featured..just terrible plot and lines..
It is NOT BSG.. and not Stargate SG1 or Atlantis.. other than a gate that spins in a dimly lit room and an occasional glimpse of Ricky D there is no resemblance …they should just change the title..
count me out..stick a fork. think I’m so dun…

Leave a Reply




home | sitemap | contact | Copyright © 2008 theTVaddict.com