<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good News, Bad News: JON &amp; KATE, UGLY BETTY &amp; VIRTUALITY</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetvaddict.com/2009/06/29/good-news-bad-news-jon-kate-ugly-betty-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/06/29/good-news-bad-news-jon-kate-ugly-betty-more/</link>
	<description>theTVaddict.com is your number one source on the net for TV news, scoop, reviews and commentary on all of your favourite TV shows. Check out theTVaddict.com daily for commentary, a WHAT TO WATCH TVguide, and a weekly podcast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 09:05:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: forg</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/06/29/good-news-bad-news-jon-kate-ugly-betty-more/comment-page-1/#comment-275339</link>
		<dc:creator>forg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/?p=6916#comment-275339</guid>
		<description>Susan Boyle is a more apt guest for UGLY BETTY than Lindsay Lohan before. If this would help the ratings of UB then its okay for me, the show is in danger this season</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Susan Boyle is a more apt guest for UGLY BETTY than Lindsay Lohan before. If this would help the ratings of UB then its okay for me, the show is in danger this season</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/06/29/good-news-bad-news-jon-kate-ugly-betty-more/comment-page-1/#comment-275336</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/?p=6916#comment-275336</guid>
		<description>Is anyone suprised by the ratings for Virtuality though?  It had three strong things against it: (1) it premeired in the summer when networks rarely have anything new so people don&#039;t pay attention, (2) it aired on Friday, and (3) everyone knew it was a failed pilot that FOX was just burning off...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone suprised by the ratings for Virtuality though?  It had three strong things against it: (1) it premeired in the summer when networks rarely have anything new so people don&#8217;t pay attention, (2) it aired on Friday, and (3) everyone knew it was a failed pilot that FOX was just burning off&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hils</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/06/29/good-news-bad-news-jon-kate-ugly-betty-more/comment-page-1/#comment-275325</link>
		<dc:creator>Hils</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/?p=6916#comment-275325</guid>
		<description>Too bad for Virtuality. No one I talked to knew it it had aired and some hadn&#039;t even seen an ad leading up to it. Way to go FOX.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad for Virtuality. No one I talked to knew it it had aired and some hadn&#8217;t even seen an ad leading up to it. Way to go FOX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
