<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tonight&#8217;s TV Addictions: February 2, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/</link>
	<description>theTVaddict.com is your number one source on the net for TV news, scoop, reviews and commentary on all of your favourite TV shows. Check out theTVaddict.com daily for commentary, a WHAT TO WATCH TVguide, and a weekly podcast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:02:41 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd W in NC</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-268465</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd W in NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 17:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/#comment-268465</guid>
		<description>SPOILER WARNING
:
:
:
:
Okay, it&#039;s been a couple more days, and this post is about to move into the Previous Posts territory anyway, so I&#039;ll be less cryptic about my question...

It seems Peters abilities have two new limitations (*Spoilers*), one obvious, the other possibly just assumed:  (1) he has to touch someone to absorb their ability; (2) he may be limited to one power at a time.

I&#039;m totally okay with #1.  That&#039;s probably how it should have been all along to keep his powers from getting out of hand in the first place.  And, since they did get a little excessive, I can understand the writers trying to &quot;reset&quot; his abilities (even though the events of Volume 3 was a bad way of doing it).

On the other hand, I don&#039;t like limitation #2, because I liked bad-@$$, multi-power Peter.  I liked that it made him unique among the heroes and that it made him the equal &amp; opposite to Sylar.  It made him special among those that were special.  I&#039;ll be disappointed if they really do give him this limitation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SPOILER WARNING<br />
:<br />
:<br />
:<br />
:<br />
Okay, it&#8217;s been a couple more days, and this post is about to move into the Previous Posts territory anyway, so I&#8217;ll be less cryptic about my question&#8230;</p>
<p>It seems Peters abilities have two new limitations (*Spoilers*), one obvious, the other possibly just assumed:  (1) he has to touch someone to absorb their ability; (2) he may be limited to one power at a time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m totally okay with #1.  That&#8217;s probably how it should have been all along to keep his powers from getting out of hand in the first place.  And, since they did get a little excessive, I can understand the writers trying to &#8220;reset&#8221; his abilities (even though the events of Volume 3 was a bad way of doing it).</p>
<p>On the other hand, I don&#8217;t like limitation #2, because I liked bad-@$$, multi-power Peter.  I liked that it made him unique among the heroes and that it made him the equal &amp; opposite to Sylar.  It made him special among those that were special.  I&#8217;ll be disappointed if they really do give him this limitation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: none</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-268403</link>
		<dc:creator>none</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/#comment-268403</guid>
		<description>I think I know what you want to ask TODD

And yes it really seems like it - otherwise the last scene wouldnt be such a shock if you know what I mean
But if its really like that he is in danger

Hope I didnt give too much away, for those whohavent seen it yet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I know what you want to ask TODD</p>
<p>And yes it really seems like it &#8211; otherwise the last scene wouldnt be such a shock if you know what I mean<br />
But if its really like that he is in danger</p>
<p>Hope I didnt give too much away, for those whohavent seen it yet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-268402</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 18:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/#comment-268402</guid>
		<description>Todd:  Peter took the shot that Mohinder developed to give powers.  But I think it just gave him back the power to absorb other people&#039;s powers, not all of the powers he used to have.  That was why he said something to Nathan like what was the last power you saw me use and he said he saw Peter fly.  So now he has to go about recollecting them...  And if you want to ask something spoilery, I say just make that your first sentence in biiiiiig letters. haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd:  Peter took the shot that Mohinder developed to give powers.  But I think it just gave him back the power to absorb other people&#8217;s powers, not all of the powers he used to have.  That was why he said something to Nathan like what was the last power you saw me use and he said he saw Peter fly.  So now he has to go about recollecting them&#8230;  And if you want to ask something spoilery, I say just make that your first sentence in biiiiiig letters. haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd W in NC</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-268398</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd W in NC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 16:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/#comment-268398</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused about Peter&#039;s power(s) on Heroes.  At the end of Volume 3, did he get his power back?  If so, I&#039;ve already forgotten how.

I&#039;ve read some theories elsewhere as to the change in Peter&#039;s ability(ies), and I think some people may have noticed something I didn&#039;t.  I&#039;m tempted to ask a question about it here, but I&#039;m not sure this if thread is considered spoiler-free or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused about Peter&#8217;s power(s) on Heroes.  At the end of Volume 3, did he get his power back?  If so, I&#8217;ve already forgotten how.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read some theories elsewhere as to the change in Peter&#8217;s ability(ies), and I think some people may have noticed something I didn&#8217;t.  I&#8217;m tempted to ask a question about it here, but I&#8217;m not sure this if thread is considered spoiler-free or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ace</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-268396</link>
		<dc:creator>Ace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/#comment-268396</guid>
		<description>See the plane crash was the worst part of the episode to me.  I was actually enjoying the characters being semi-normal and seeing them get back to their daily lives.  And then it was like, just kiiiiidding, we&#039;re going to round them all up, put them on a plane and then CRASH it!  See what we did there, viewers, DRAMA!  Gahhhh!  When does Bryan Fuller come back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See the plane crash was the worst part of the episode to me.  I was actually enjoying the characters being semi-normal and seeing them get back to their daily lives.  And then it was like, just kiiiiidding, we&#8217;re going to round them all up, put them on a plane and then CRASH it!  See what we did there, viewers, DRAMA!  Gahhhh!  When does Bryan Fuller come back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh C.</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-268387</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 04:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/#comment-268387</guid>
		<description>this season of 24 more than makes up for last season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this season of 24 more than makes up for last season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: none</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-268386</link>
		<dc:creator>none</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 03:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/#comment-268386</guid>
		<description>ok if you fought trought the first 45 minutes of heroes you  wouldnt disappointed imo

that plan crash thing was great
u gotta love stories that start with a plan crash lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok if you fought trought the first 45 minutes of heroes you  wouldnt disappointed imo</p>
<p>that plan crash thing was great<br />
u gotta love stories that start with a plan crash lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hilsto</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-268380</link>
		<dc:creator>Hilsto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/#comment-268380</guid>
		<description>I love Medium. One of the few shows where the female lead is actually married and the whole &quot;who will she end up with&quot; thing isn&#039;t part of the show as seems to be the case for every other drama out there. In fact her husband and family are part of what makes the show so good. You don&#039;t really get to see that played out on tv. 

The show is a lot better than its TV Guide blurb. Not sure why people read those anyway. Are they ever quite right? I can&#039;t remember why I started watching it because it is definitely not the type of show I watch (I think I was afraid it was another Ghost Whisperer and avoided it the first few seasons) but I ended up catching a few and was hooked enough to pick up the box set. And yes, she&#039;s a medium but that doesn&#039;t mean she can turn it on and off at will. The premise they set up works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Medium. One of the few shows where the female lead is actually married and the whole &#8220;who will she end up with&#8221; thing isn&#8217;t part of the show as seems to be the case for every other drama out there. In fact her husband and family are part of what makes the show so good. You don&#8217;t really get to see that played out on tv. </p>
<p>The show is a lot better than its TV Guide blurb. Not sure why people read those anyway. Are they ever quite right? I can&#8217;t remember why I started watching it because it is definitely not the type of show I watch (I think I was afraid it was another Ghost Whisperer and avoided it the first few seasons) but I ended up catching a few and was hooked enough to pick up the box set. And yes, she&#8217;s a medium but that doesn&#8217;t mean she can turn it on and off at will. The premise they set up works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CC</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-268376</link>
		<dc:creator>CC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 23:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/#comment-268376</guid>
		<description>MAN I&#039;m sick of good shows being cancelled! Kyle xy pushing daisies moonlight etc etc. I have no faith in television networks what so ever! Theyre freakin idiots!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAN I&#8217;m sick of good shows being cancelled! Kyle xy pushing daisies moonlight etc etc. I have no faith in television networks what so ever! Theyre freakin idiots!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theTVaddict</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-268374</link>
		<dc:creator>theTVaddict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 22:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/02/02/tonights-tv-addictions-february-2-2009/#comment-268374</guid>
		<description>foursweatervests,

Thanks for reminding me. In truth, tonight&#039;s installment of CHUCK is bittersweet due to my total lack of 3D glasses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>foursweatervests,</p>
<p>Thanks for reminding me. In truth, tonight&#8217;s installment of CHUCK is bittersweet due to my total lack of 3D glasses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
