<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: DAMAGES Season 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/</link>
	<description>theTVaddict.com is your number one source on the net for TV news, scoop, reviews and commentary on all of your favourite TV shows. Check out theTVaddict.com daily for commentary, a WHAT TO WATCH TVguide, and a weekly podcast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:10:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Holy Cheese</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-276561</link>
		<dc:creator>Holy Cheese</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 15:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/#comment-276561</guid>
		<description>Aleks you&#039;re bang on.  Your final paragraph sums it perfectly.  The first series was great.  But I just finished the second, if this series makes it to the completion of the six season deal of the main actors.  I will be hugely surprised.  

&quot;Alex&quot;, you have nothing to be proud, of other than you can spell a four letter word, which happens to be your name.  Like the use of a smiley, really added weight to your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aleks you&#8217;re bang on.  Your final paragraph sums it perfectly.  The first series was great.  But I just finished the second, if this series makes it to the completion of the six season deal of the main actors.  I will be hugely surprised.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Alex&#8221;, you have nothing to be proud, of other than you can spell a four letter word, which happens to be your name.  Like the use of a smiley, really added weight to your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RobertC</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-275972</link>
		<dc:creator>RobertC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 17:14:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/#comment-275972</guid>
		<description>Whilst some may decry this show as overly convoluted and totally lacking the requisite emotional connection with the central characters, you have to remember that this is easily some of the best writing on TV at the moment. I can&#039;t recall a recent show that has been as tightly written and scripted as Damages, let alone with the same star-powered cast.

Some reviewers have compared the flashback/flashforward style to Lost, but the key difference they forget to mention is that Damages rewards viewers who stick around until the end, whereas Lost has become an entangled morass of unanswered questions and utter confusion.

With Damages, there is always a sense that the answers will be revealed. But the fun, as the producers intimated, is how the answers are arrived at. I enjoy the twists and turns because it keeps you interested, even if they are occasionally tiresome or predictable. But that&#039;s serialised TV. We all know the purpose of Season 2 was for Ellen and Patty to have some kind of showdown. However, it is ultimately the series of events in the intervening episodes that make the showdown all the more powerful. We find that a number of characters are slyly playing both sides and the contest of wit and cleverness between, say, Walter and Claire, or Patty and Ellen; is engrossing to watch on screen.

The only character who I thought wasn&#039;t used appropriately was that of William Hurt. On the one hand, he is unhappy about the egregious environmental damage being committed by UNR, but he is all the more happy to perjure himself on the back of a handsome UNR pay-off. This is justified with excuses about wanting to look after his daughter, yet his motives never seem that convincing because the script portrays him as being deeply haunted by the death of his wife (which he unsuccessfully instigated) whilst enjoying chummy sexual relations with Claire Maddox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whilst some may decry this show as overly convoluted and totally lacking the requisite emotional connection with the central characters, you have to remember that this is easily some of the best writing on TV at the moment. I can&#8217;t recall a recent show that has been as tightly written and scripted as Damages, let alone with the same star-powered cast.</p>
<p>Some reviewers have compared the flashback/flashforward style to Lost, but the key difference they forget to mention is that Damages rewards viewers who stick around until the end, whereas Lost has become an entangled morass of unanswered questions and utter confusion.</p>
<p>With Damages, there is always a sense that the answers will be revealed. But the fun, as the producers intimated, is how the answers are arrived at. I enjoy the twists and turns because it keeps you interested, even if they are occasionally tiresome or predictable. But that&#8217;s serialised TV. We all know the purpose of Season 2 was for Ellen and Patty to have some kind of showdown. However, it is ultimately the series of events in the intervening episodes that make the showdown all the more powerful. We find that a number of characters are slyly playing both sides and the contest of wit and cleverness between, say, Walter and Claire, or Patty and Ellen; is engrossing to watch on screen.</p>
<p>The only character who I thought wasn&#8217;t used appropriately was that of William Hurt. On the one hand, he is unhappy about the egregious environmental damage being committed by UNR, but he is all the more happy to perjure himself on the back of a handsome UNR pay-off. This is justified with excuses about wanting to look after his daughter, yet his motives never seem that convincing because the script portrays him as being deeply haunted by the death of his wife (which he unsuccessfully instigated) whilst enjoying chummy sexual relations with Claire Maddox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-275491</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/#comment-275491</guid>
		<description>Just finish Season 2, love it! Satisfying ending! Will there be Season 3?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just finish Season 2, love it! Satisfying ending! Will there be Season 3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BG</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-271045</link>
		<dc:creator>BG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:32:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/#comment-271045</guid>
		<description>Here is the source url for the quoted material in my post:

http://blogcritics.org/writer/aleks_chan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the source url for the quoted material in my post:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogcritics.org/writer/aleks_chan" rel="nofollow">http://blogcritics.org/writer/aleks_chan</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BG</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-271044</link>
		<dc:creator>BG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/#comment-271044</guid>
		<description>As of November-December 2006,

&lt;i&gt;Aleks Chan is a young (16) writer living in San Antonio, and hopes to one day leave the homeland to be Gillian Flynn&#039;s successor at Entertainment Weekly.&lt;/i&gt;

Needs some time to grow up.  In the meantime there is The Simpsons, King of the Hill, Scrubs, American Idol, lots of nonchallenging TV out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of November-December 2006,</p>
<p><i>Aleks Chan is a young (16) writer living in San Antonio, and hopes to one day leave the homeland to be Gillian Flynn&#8217;s successor at Entertainment Weekly.</i></p>
<p>Needs some time to grow up.  In the meantime there is The Simpsons, King of the Hill, Scrubs, American Idol, lots of nonchallenging TV out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-270550</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/#comment-270550</guid>
		<description>Bill Nussbaumer&#039;s review is the one that should be at the top of this page.  The biggest thing Damages season 2 had going for it at the start was our desire to see Patty get what&#039;s coming to her.  I tuned in to see a showdown, and I fully expected Ellen to become as dark and heartless as Patty.  Now all of a sudden I&#039;m watching her battle Big Energy?  It seems like an unnecessary distraction.

Frobisher should have died in that field.  It was a perfect, poetic end.  And this season should have been about revenge.

I also miss Ellen&#039;s adorable late fiance and Frobisher&#039;s lawyer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Nussbaumer&#8217;s review is the one that should be at the top of this page.  The biggest thing Damages season 2 had going for it at the start was our desire to see Patty get what&#8217;s coming to her.  I tuned in to see a showdown, and I fully expected Ellen to become as dark and heartless as Patty.  Now all of a sudden I&#8217;m watching her battle Big Energy?  It seems like an unnecessary distraction.</p>
<p>Frobisher should have died in that field.  It was a perfect, poetic end.  And this season should have been about revenge.</p>
<p>I also miss Ellen&#8217;s adorable late fiance and Frobisher&#8217;s lawyer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Nussbaumer</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-270348</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Nussbaumer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/#comment-270348</guid>
		<description>I have to say after watching 10 episodes of season two I&#039;m feeling what this review is saying.  I watched hour 9 and 10 of the show yesterday and when I was done, I wanted that 2 hours of my life back.  The show has reached a new level of boring for me.  I run through a list of characters in my head and think of who&#039;d I be sad to see get killed and the answer is none of them, not one character has generated an emotional attachment for me.  (Ok I&#039;d be sad if Ellen&#039;s mom was killed.)  I can&#039;t even figure out why William Hurt&#039;s character is important to the show.  There&#039;s no real development of his story as a father, husband or his extramarital relationship.  His plot points could have been served equally well just introducing a fake toxicity report from some random faceless company.  To top it off the environmental infractions seem like a tacked on addition to make UNR even &quot;more bad&quot;. 

The plot twists were mostly a strength in season one but by this point the twists have become so formulaic they themselves have become boring.  While you don&#039;t always know exactly what is going to happen, it&#039;s a safe bet what you just saw is not the truth.  You only saw 35 seconds of that event, the next 20 seconds will turn that on it&#039;s head and then 3 weeks later you&#039;ll see it from a different camera and it will once again be turned on its head.  For example Ellen talks to the feds, says one thing and then gets out of the car.  Later it turns out she got back in the car and decides to do exactly the opposite.  While sudden revelatory plot twists (ala &quot;The Usual Supects&quot;) can be great fun, after awhile you get tired of being lied to just so the show can spring the truth on you at a later date. 

All in all the show has some strong actors that do what they can to put life into their characters but the quick pace of the convoluted plot leaves little room for true character devleopment or even proper treatment of the individual plot threads.  It seems as the show moves along with the express purpose of setting you up to be suprised with a series of &quot;reveals&quot; with the biggest yet to come in the season finale. 

I&#039;m glad there are still lots of fans for the show, I really wanted to like it but I guess it&#039;s just not for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say after watching 10 episodes of season two I&#8217;m feeling what this review is saying.  I watched hour 9 and 10 of the show yesterday and when I was done, I wanted that 2 hours of my life back.  The show has reached a new level of boring for me.  I run through a list of characters in my head and think of who&#8217;d I be sad to see get killed and the answer is none of them, not one character has generated an emotional attachment for me.  (Ok I&#8217;d be sad if Ellen&#8217;s mom was killed.)  I can&#8217;t even figure out why William Hurt&#8217;s character is important to the show.  There&#8217;s no real development of his story as a father, husband or his extramarital relationship.  His plot points could have been served equally well just introducing a fake toxicity report from some random faceless company.  To top it off the environmental infractions seem like a tacked on addition to make UNR even &#8220;more bad&#8221;. </p>
<p>The plot twists were mostly a strength in season one but by this point the twists have become so formulaic they themselves have become boring.  While you don&#8217;t always know exactly what is going to happen, it&#8217;s a safe bet what you just saw is not the truth.  You only saw 35 seconds of that event, the next 20 seconds will turn that on it&#8217;s head and then 3 weeks later you&#8217;ll see it from a different camera and it will once again be turned on its head.  For example Ellen talks to the feds, says one thing and then gets out of the car.  Later it turns out she got back in the car and decides to do exactly the opposite.  While sudden revelatory plot twists (ala &#8220;The Usual Supects&#8221;) can be great fun, after awhile you get tired of being lied to just so the show can spring the truth on you at a later date. </p>
<p>All in all the show has some strong actors that do what they can to put life into their characters but the quick pace of the convoluted plot leaves little room for true character devleopment or even proper treatment of the individual plot threads.  It seems as the show moves along with the express purpose of setting you up to be suprised with a series of &#8220;reveals&#8221; with the biggest yet to come in the season finale. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad there are still lots of fans for the show, I really wanted to like it but I guess it&#8217;s just not for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pakimbash akiz</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-270272</link>
		<dc:creator>pakimbash akiz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/#comment-270272</guid>
		<description>really harsh!!!!! i love damages, glenn close is just riveting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>really harsh!!!!! i love damages, glenn close is just riveting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paul</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-269862</link>
		<dc:creator>paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 20:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/#comment-269862</guid>
		<description>I have to think the reviewer has either been watching the wrong program or he had his imagination surgically removed soon after birth.
It is very easy to pick holes in just about any movie or TV drama if you are not prepared buy into the premise of the drama in the first place.
If it were merely a case of things being far fetched, overly complex or silly then we would all be sitting home looking at the walls.
So if you have not seen Damages 1 or 2 then ignore this reviewer he is a twat and make your own mind up. It would be my guess that you won&#039;t be disappointed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to think the reviewer has either been watching the wrong program or he had his imagination surgically removed soon after birth.<br />
It is very easy to pick holes in just about any movie or TV drama if you are not prepared buy into the premise of the drama in the first place.<br />
If it were merely a case of things being far fetched, overly complex or silly then we would all be sitting home looking at the walls.<br />
So if you have not seen Damages 1 or 2 then ignore this reviewer he is a twat and make your own mind up. It would be my guess that you won&#8217;t be disappointed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fruk</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/comment-page-1/#comment-268933</link>
		<dc:creator>fruk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:27:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2009/01/07/review-damages-season-2/#comment-268933</guid>
		<description>Excellent Review.
Series 1 was edgy and grainy.
The direction, photography and editing made you forgive
the gaping plot holes.
And there were three great male characters and actors who 
they killed off - leaving us with two unbelievable females.
Buy season 1 on DVD and watch it again, instead of 
the Season 2 dross.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent Review.<br />
Series 1 was edgy and grainy.<br />
The direction, photography and editing made you forgive<br />
the gaping plot holes.<br />
And there were three great male characters and actors who<br />
they killed off &#8211; leaving us with two unbelievable females.<br />
Buy season 1 on DVD and watch it again, instead of<br />
the Season 2 dross.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
