<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Call to Emmy Voters: Stop Voting For &#8216;Name&#8217; Guest Actors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetvaddict.com/2008/07/08/a-call-to-emmy-voters-stop-voting-for-name-actors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/07/08/a-call-to-emmy-voters-stop-voting-for-name-actors/</link>
	<description>theTVaddict.com is your number one source on the net for TV news, scoop, reviews and commentary on all of your favourite TV shows. Check out theTVaddict.com daily for commentary, a WHAT TO WATCH TVguide, and a weekly podcast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:03:11 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: EmmysAlive</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/07/08/a-call-to-emmy-voters-stop-voting-for-name-actors/comment-page-1/#comment-258068</link>
		<dc:creator>EmmysAlive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 10:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2008/07/08/a-call-to-emmy-voters-stop-voting-for-name-actors/#comment-258068</guid>
		<description>A guest starring role, as I understand it, means an appearance of an already established performer who is onboard to either boost ratings or fits the profile of a one-off character required for the show.

I believe any up and coming young performer wouldn&#039;t have the clout/star power/sway to either boost ratings or act as a mentor to existing characters on the show.

The guest star category for the Emmys should remain because it highlights the diversity of roles offered for actors willing to manoeuvre between film and television and offers interesting and watchable storylines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A guest starring role, as I understand it, means an appearance of an already established performer who is onboard to either boost ratings or fits the profile of a one-off character required for the show.</p>
<p>I believe any up and coming young performer wouldn&#8217;t have the clout/star power/sway to either boost ratings or act as a mentor to existing characters on the show.</p>
<p>The guest star category for the Emmys should remain because it highlights the diversity of roles offered for actors willing to manoeuvre between film and television and offers interesting and watchable storylines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/07/08/a-call-to-emmy-voters-stop-voting-for-name-actors/comment-page-1/#comment-258033</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 22:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2008/07/08/a-call-to-emmy-voters-stop-voting-for-name-actors/#comment-258033</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just given up on the Emmy&#039;s. I won&#039;t bother watching them unless someone truly deserving gets nominated. Which will be never.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just given up on the Emmy&#8217;s. I won&#8217;t bother watching them unless someone truly deserving gets nominated. Which will be never.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/07/08/a-call-to-emmy-voters-stop-voting-for-name-actors/comment-page-1/#comment-257967</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2008/07/08/a-call-to-emmy-voters-stop-voting-for-name-actors/#comment-257967</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s so obvious, it&#039;s criminal:  The &quot;Nominating Committee&quot; nominates their own acting friends or big names they recognize--WITHOUT FAIL.  The Emmys do not go to the most-worthy (we ALL know that), but rather are given as a lifetime award to those deemed worthy or as a lure/reward to &quot;film&quot; stars to continue working in the TV medium.   

The Emmys are so pathetically irrelevent, why does anyone even bother with them anymore?  They&#039;ve turned themselves into an industry laughingstock.  My guess is, they&#039;re really befuddled this year without the Sopranos available to stock each category with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so obvious, it&#8217;s criminal:  The &#8220;Nominating Committee&#8221; nominates their own acting friends or big names they recognize&#8211;WITHOUT FAIL.  The Emmys do not go to the most-worthy (we ALL know that), but rather are given as a lifetime award to those deemed worthy or as a lure/reward to &#8220;film&#8221; stars to continue working in the TV medium.   </p>
<p>The Emmys are so pathetically irrelevent, why does anyone even bother with them anymore?  They&#8217;ve turned themselves into an industry laughingstock.  My guess is, they&#8217;re really befuddled this year without the Sopranos available to stock each category with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
