Comments on: SUPERNATURAL Fans: Blame Canada!

By: Rebecca

Rebecca — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 02:54:28 +0000

And the rising Canadian dollar is the reason she’s gone. Well, then go Canadian dollar. Her loss is great because she was a lousy actress. Besides Meg came back in a different suit. The CRD came back in several suites. Same goes for Lilith and the YED. Besides, as far as I can remember, people over at the CW Lounge were crying for her to be axed.

By: amanda

amanda — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:53:00 +0000

I have never more prouder to be Canadian. Yes! She is gone!

By: girodet

girodet — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:45:28 +0000

I am always surprised when I watch this show at the high production level, specifically the special effects, considering the ratings numbers and the fact it is on the CW. As long as they keep focusing the money on what makes this show great I will get over the fact that recurring characters do not happen.

By: Mel

Mel — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 12:26:54 +0000

LOL Ewanspotter! I agree! They could lose a couple of layers and still remain regrettably decent. Did you see the TV Guide pictures of Jared? SUCH a shame to cover that up as well.
But, of course, I watch Supernatural for the plot. (Stop snickering, TVAddict!) And as far as plot goes, the Ruby character can come back, just like the Meg or Lillith or YED or CRD characters did, in a different ‘meatsuit.’
I hope there’s a little $$ left for classic rock. The Impala cruising down the road to elevator music is just — wrong.

By: ewanspotter

ewanspotter — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:50:15 +0000

If they’re really that strapped for cash, I say they cut back the wardrobe department. Jensen Ackles doesn’t need all that pesky clothing on the show anyway.

By: Luke K

Luke K — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 04:40:51 +0000

@ Luke K: In case you don’t know, making shows like this are SUPER-expensive. The CW must really love this show, cause ratings so low, and the show been so expensive… Just look what happened to Moonlight, even when it had more ratings!

By: Mel

Mel — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:59:27 +0000

I liked the Ruby character better than Bela, which isn’t saying much, but I’m not going to shed any tears over Katie Cassidy leaving.
I wish both Katie and Lauren much success in future projects.
I never thought Supernatural needed to become an ensemble. Jim Beaver’s Bobby is the only ‘recurring’ character besides Sam and Dean I want to see. Unless of course, they could ever get Jeffrey Dean Morgan back for a flashback episode or two . . .

By: Judy

Judy — Tue, 24 Jun 2008 03:08:00 +0000

Well, maybe if the CW didn’t spend so much of it’s promotion money towards Gossip Girl and the soon to air 90120, Supernatural wouldn’t have to let go of characters just to stay afloat.

By: Patty

Patty — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:59:13 +0000

Aw, how sad! Ruby was starting to grow on me at the end… At least they just cut a character instead of canceling the show.

By: Luke K.

Luke K. — Mon, 23 Jun 2008 23:37:50 +0000

To be blunt, this STINKS. Katie Cassidy is H.O.T., and I loved her as Ruby. Sheesh, if this show can’t even afford a semi-regular, relative-newcomer to the industry, what else is gonna be axed? Will the boys be driving a Pinto? Will the hotel set decor be more Super 8-ish? Will we see Sam in one episode, then Dean the next? This is getting frikkin ridiculous!