<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Channel Surfing with C.T.</title>
	<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/</link>
	<description>theTVaddict.com is your number one source on the net for TV news, scoop, reviews and commentary on all of your favourite TV shows. Check out theTVaddict.com daily for commentary, a WHAT TO WATCH TVguide, and a weekly podcast.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kristen</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254779</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 05:26:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254779</guid>
		<description>I can't believe it's taken you this long to discover what is the brilliance of Joel McHale on The Soup!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s taken you this long to discover what is the brilliance of Joel McHale on The Soup!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ct</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254622</link>
		<dc:creator>ct</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:21:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254622</guid>
		<description>For the record, I'm a big ol' Holly Harper fan. I just don't lke the way the show has chosen to write her. as with other characters, they sort of twist and bend her personality to meet the needs of the plot du jour. I was stunned when she went off on rebecca. Was it a good scene? Yeah. But did Holly REALLY have a leg to stand on? After she repeatedly lied to Rebecca, claiming there was "no chance" that anyone but William could be her father? For Holly to turn around and make her daughter feel like crap when, in reality, it was Holly's lie that caused all the heartbreak just felt very wrong to me.

And y'all are right: I forgot about Vanessa's two-second scenes in the coffee shop. Sharp eyes, y'all!

JOSH: When I say "take Scotty with her" I mean that he's too good for that messed up clan, as is Rebecca. I like Scotty. He's a little whiny sometimes, but I suppose that balances out Kevin's neurosis. Of course, this show has the same problem as most shows which try to write gay characters, and that is in defining who is the, for gentle readers, "male" and who is the "female." It seemed pretty obvious that with Kevin's last two boyfriends, he was the female, while with Scotty I've gotta think he's the male. And if ever there was a character that didn't seem to qualify as "versatile", it's going to be Kevin. I remember having the same problem with both Will and Jack on WILL &#38; GRACE. 

COMMON SENSE: Oh my God, I totally did not realize that was Justine Bateman. You're right... she looks like crap. I even remember thinking, "Lord, couldn't they have found someone... at least a little more attractive???" And I'd say that I'm with you on the Kayla thing if it weren't for the fact that without her, we might have even less plot movement. I mean, heck, if she can convince a couple of the scavo kids to jump off the roof and break their necks, that wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. (Who said that???)

Guess I'm the only one who thought the "queer" and "faggot" stuff on GG was out of place. I agree that if it weren't shocking, I'd be more concerned, given what that would mean about our society. So good point, TVAddict.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the record, I&#8217;m a big ol&#8217; Holly Harper fan. I just don&#8217;t lke the way the show has chosen to write her. as with other characters, they sort of twist and bend her personality to meet the needs of the plot du jour. I was stunned when she went off on rebecca. Was it a good scene? Yeah. But did Holly REALLY have a leg to stand on? After she repeatedly lied to Rebecca, claiming there was &#8220;no chance&#8221; that anyone but William could be her father? For Holly to turn around and make her daughter feel like crap when, in reality, it was Holly&#8217;s lie that caused all the heartbreak just felt very wrong to me.</p>
<p>And y&#8217;all are right: I forgot about Vanessa&#8217;s two-second scenes in the coffee shop. Sharp eyes, y&#8217;all!</p>
<p>JOSH: When I say &#8220;take Scotty with her&#8221; I mean that he&#8217;s too good for that messed up clan, as is Rebecca. I like Scotty. He&#8217;s a little whiny sometimes, but I suppose that balances out Kevin&#8217;s neurosis. Of course, this show has the same problem as most shows which try to write gay characters, and that is in defining who is the, for gentle readers, &#8220;male&#8221; and who is the &#8220;female.&#8221; It seemed pretty obvious that with Kevin&#8217;s last two boyfriends, he was the female, while with Scotty I&#8217;ve gotta think he&#8217;s the male. And if ever there was a character that didn&#8217;t seem to qualify as &#8220;versatile&#8221;, it&#8217;s going to be Kevin. I remember having the same problem with both Will and Jack on WILL &amp; GRACE. </p>
<p>COMMON SENSE: Oh my God, I totally did not realize that was Justine Bateman. You&#8217;re right&#8230; she looks like crap. I even remember thinking, &#8220;Lord, couldn&#8217;t they have found someone&#8230; at least a little more attractive???&#8221; And I&#8217;d say that I&#8217;m with you on the Kayla thing if it weren&#8217;t for the fact that without her, we might have even less plot movement. I mean, heck, if she can convince a couple of the scavo kids to jump off the roof and break their necks, that wouldn&#8217;t be the worst thing in the world. (Who said that???)</p>
<p>Guess I&#8217;m the only one who thought the &#8220;queer&#8221; and &#8220;faggot&#8221; stuff on GG was out of place. I agree that if it weren&#8217;t shocking, I&#8217;d be more concerned, given what that would mean about our society. So good point, TVAddict.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naf</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254588</link>
		<dc:creator>Naf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254588</guid>
		<description>Venessa also was chating with Dan and "Sarah" at the place where she works at the start of the episode.

I don't have a problem with Holly on Brothers and Sisters, and I thought this weeks episode was fantastic after just a poor run recently. Holly is a complicated woman who has made a lot of mistakes in her life, but i wouldn't band her as a "lying slut with a persecution complex". She feel in love with a married man, and then had a child after having sex with another man. All of this whilst being broke. I believe Holly wanted Rebecca to be a Walker just as much as Rebecca did. In lesser lands, the character could have been someone we could easily hate, but Patricia Wettig is so fantastic in the role that I can't help but feel for her. Her confrontation with Rebecca was fantastic, and even when the storylines on the show are subpar, you can always rely on the characters to rise above it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Venessa also was chating with Dan and &#8220;Sarah&#8221; at the place where she works at the start of the episode.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have a problem with Holly on Brothers and Sisters, and I thought this weeks episode was fantastic after just a poor run recently. Holly is a complicated woman who has made a lot of mistakes in her life, but i wouldn&#8217;t band her as a &#8220;lying slut with a persecution complex&#8221;. She feel in love with a married man, and then had a child after having sex with another man. All of this whilst being broke. I believe Holly wanted Rebecca to be a Walker just as much as Rebecca did. In lesser lands, the character could have been someone we could easily hate, but Patricia Wettig is so fantastic in the role that I can&#8217;t help but feel for her. Her confrontation with Rebecca was fantastic, and even when the storylines on the show are subpar, you can always rely on the characters to rise above it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aileen</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254584</link>
		<dc:creator>Aileen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254584</guid>
		<description>Vanessa was in the episode on Monday, but she was kind of blink-and-you-miss it. She was at the coffee shop when "Sarah" met Serena.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vanessa was in the episode on Monday, but she was kind of blink-and-you-miss it. She was at the coffee shop when &#8220;Sarah&#8221; met Serena.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Emerson</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254582</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Emerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 16:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254582</guid>
		<description>B&#38;S: Take Scotty with her? Whaaaat? No! He's got to stay on this show. He's way better than any of the other guys Kevin has dated. And he's barely shown anyway. Hope that changes next season when he's a regular. 

But yeah, overall I have not been impressed at all with Brothers &#38; Sisters since the post-strike return. It went from boring to annoying to just puzzling. Could this be the affect of the creator leaving the show? I'm not sure when he officially left, but something must've happened for the show to turn into this. Storylines bordering on incest (I don't care if they aren't "technically" blood related!) is where a line has to be drawn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B&amp;S: Take Scotty with her? Whaaaat? No! He&#8217;s got to stay on this show. He&#8217;s way better than any of the other guys Kevin has dated. And he&#8217;s barely shown anyway. Hope that changes next season when he&#8217;s a regular. </p>
<p>But yeah, overall I have not been impressed at all with Brothers &amp; Sisters since the post-strike return. It went from boring to annoying to just puzzling. Could this be the affect of the creator leaving the show? I&#8217;m not sure when he officially left, but something must&#8217;ve happened for the show to turn into this. Storylines bordering on incest (I don&#8217;t care if they aren&#8217;t &#8220;technically&#8221; blood related!) is where a line has to be drawn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cris</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254576</link>
		<dc:creator>Cris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 15:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254576</guid>
		<description>I Think the gay foul words worked perfectly with the storyline, and so did Jenny going down. It shows perfectly that the ''it'' crowd will always side with the rich one. I guess it would have been different if there weren't two people involved, but she was and she said he took her V...so, to me it made all kinds of sense. I guess in the end nobody was shocked he was gay, but that she was covering up big time for him....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I Think the gay foul words worked perfectly with the storyline, and so did Jenny going down. It shows perfectly that the &#8221;it&#8221; crowd will always side with the rich one. I guess it would have been different if there weren&#8217;t two people involved, but she was and she said he took her V&#8230;so, to me it made all kinds of sense. I guess in the end nobody was shocked he was gay, but that she was covering up big time for him&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda B.</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254575</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254575</guid>
		<description>DH: I so agree about them having existing characters and never using them. I almost forgot about the gay couple that moved into Wisteria Lane this season til we saw them again in last week's episode. I was really disappointed that they barely used Nathan Fillion's character, and now he's not even on the show anymore :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DH: I so agree about them having existing characters and never using them. I almost forgot about the gay couple that moved into Wisteria Lane this season til we saw them again in last week&#8217;s episode. I was really disappointed that they barely used Nathan Fillion&#8217;s character, and now he&#8217;s not even on the show anymore <img src='http://thetvaddict.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theTVaddict</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254571</link>
		<dc:creator>theTVaddict</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 14:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254571</guid>
		<description>I think the use of 'faggot' in GOSSIP GIRL worked perfectly and was intentionally unsettling to here. It's a sign of the times. If it wasn't unsettling, it would be far more worrisome. 

In terms of DH, I think it was a fun episode. I think 'evil' Kayla is great fun and was sort of hoping that Gaby would turn her place into a little whore house for extra income. No doubt hilarity would ensue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the use of &#8216;faggot&#8217; in GOSSIP GIRL worked perfectly and was intentionally unsettling to here. It&#8217;s a sign of the times. If it wasn&#8217;t unsettling, it would be far more worrisome. </p>
<p>In terms of DH, I think it was a fun episode. I think &#8216;evil&#8217; Kayla is great fun and was sort of hoping that Gaby would turn her place into a little whore house for extra income. No doubt hilarity would ensue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254569</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:56:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254569</guid>
		<description>P.S.  Forgot to note....Justine Bateman does not look healthy on DH.  Is this intentional, because of her drug-dealing story?  If not:  seriously, get her some high collars and a better hair and makeup person.  This guest role is not helping her image.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P.S.  Forgot to note&#8230;.Justine Bateman does not look healthy on DH.  Is this intentional, because of her drug-dealing story?  If not:  seriously, get her some high collars and a better hair and makeup person.  This guest role is not helping her image.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254568</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 13:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://thetvaddict.com/2008/05/08/channel-surfing-with-ct-44/#comment-254568</guid>
		<description>B &#38; S:  Holly can do no wrong for me.  Loved her showdown w/ 'Becca.

GG:  Gay dialogue rings true.  Too much going on to involve others this wk

DH:  Is it wrong to want Kayla kidnapped...or worse?  That kid's pure evil

Agree, big-time, with your one thought:  With fewer episodes and more plot promised, many shows---One Tree Hill, in particular---are delivering NOTHING.  It's excruciating to sit for an hour and watch absolutely zero plot advancement.  Note to writers:  TV shows should not happen in "real time."  We want major shockers, not trips to the freakin baby doctor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B &amp; S:  Holly can do no wrong for me.  Loved her showdown w/ &#8216;Becca.</p>
<p>GG:  Gay dialogue rings true.  Too much going on to involve others this wk</p>
<p>DH:  Is it wrong to want Kayla kidnapped&#8230;or worse?  That kid&#8217;s pure evil</p>
<p>Agree, big-time, with your one thought:  With fewer episodes and more plot promised, many shows&#8212;One Tree Hill, in particular&#8212;are delivering NOTHING.  It&#8217;s excruciating to sit for an hour and watch absolutely zero plot advancement.  Note to writers:  TV shows should not happen in &#8220;real time.&#8221;  We want major shockers, not trips to the freakin baby doctor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
