<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FOX Ditches WOMAN, Sign of Things to Come?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thetvaddict.com/2007/08/27/fox-ditches-woman-sign-of-things-to-come/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2007/08/27/fox-ditches-woman-sign-of-things-to-come/</link>
	<description>theTVaddict.com is your number one source on the net for TV news, scoop, reviews and commentary on all of your favourite TV shows. Check out theTVaddict.com daily for commentary, a WHAT TO WATCH TVguide, and a weekly podcast.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 05:06:14 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Common Sense</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2007/08/27/fox-ditches-woman-sign-of-things-to-come/comment-page-1/#comment-185984</link>
		<dc:creator>Common Sense</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 01:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2007/08/27/fox-ditches-woman-sign-of-things-to-come/#comment-185984</guid>
		<description>These networks just keep throwing smelly reality crap against the wall, hoping something will stick.  Tonight (Mon.), for instance, ABC offers up a wipe of Wife Swap, a whiff of Fat March, and an S.B.D. of Supernanny.  Is it any wonder I am sitting here typing on the computer while CBS (and Charlie Sheen...ugh!!!) play in the background?? 

Why can&#039;t (or WON&#039;T) the nets play on Monday?  Guess what, folks, in a few weeks, we&#039;ll have The CW&#039;s Aliens and Chris to enjoy, so the reality scraps can be left in a pile out back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These networks just keep throwing smelly reality crap against the wall, hoping something will stick.  Tonight (Mon.), for instance, ABC offers up a wipe of Wife Swap, a whiff of Fat March, and an S.B.D. of Supernanny.  Is it any wonder I am sitting here typing on the computer while CBS (and Charlie Sheen&#8230;ugh!!!) play in the background?? </p>
<p>Why can&#8217;t (or WON&#8217;T) the nets play on Monday?  Guess what, folks, in a few weeks, we&#8217;ll have The CW&#8217;s Aliens and Chris to enjoy, so the reality scraps can be left in a pile out back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2007/08/27/fox-ditches-woman-sign-of-things-to-come/comment-page-1/#comment-185979</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Aug 2007 01:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2007/08/27/fox-ditches-woman-sign-of-things-to-come/#comment-185979</guid>
		<description>After Fox fumbled Drive the way they did, I decided I would not watch a new show on Fox again until they change their tune.  Back to You looks interesting but why should I waste my time?  Almost every show I have really liked that has been canceled prematurely in the last 5 years has been on Fox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Fox fumbled Drive the way they did, I decided I would not watch a new show on Fox again until they change their tune.  Back to You looks interesting but why should I waste my time?  Almost every show I have really liked that has been canceled prematurely in the last 5 years has been on Fox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ewanspotter</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2007/08/27/fox-ditches-woman-sign-of-things-to-come/comment-page-1/#comment-185936</link>
		<dc:creator>ewanspotter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2007/08/27/fox-ditches-woman-sign-of-things-to-come/#comment-185936</guid>
		<description>&quot;In either case, Jones and company certainly deserved more than one episode to show us what they could do.&quot;

You know, USUALLY I&#039;d be inclined to agree with you for a *fictional* show, but I don&#039;t have a ton of sympathy for *reality* TV. Especially reality TV like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In either case, Jones and company certainly deserved more than one episode to show us what they could do.&#8221;</p>
<p>You know, USUALLY I&#8217;d be inclined to agree with you for a *fictional* show, but I don&#8217;t have a ton of sympathy for *reality* TV. Especially reality TV like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://thetvaddict.com/2007/08/27/fox-ditches-woman-sign-of-things-to-come/comment-page-1/#comment-185919</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 23:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thetvaddict.com/2007/08/27/fox-ditches-woman-sign-of-things-to-come/#comment-185919</guid>
		<description>I would say that&#039;s the reason I won&#039;t be watching any new Fox shows, but the truth is that none of them even sound very good. I am tempted to watch The Sarah Connor Chronicles at midseason, but I have a feeling even that won&#039;t last.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say that&#8217;s the reason I won&#8217;t be watching any new Fox shows, but the truth is that none of them even sound very good. I am tempted to watch The Sarah Connor Chronicles at midseason, but I have a feeling even that won&#8217;t last.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
